Researchers in exile thrive in new academic settings when they contribute knowledge, not just receive aid

Publishing scientific articles requires more than knowledge of academic writing conventions; it also depends on access to networks that support the research and publication process. Academic networks provide opportunities to exchange knowledge, receive feedback and develop collaborations that can strengthen both research and careers. For researchers in vulnerable situations, such connections can be crucial.

"For researchers in stable circumstances, networks are often seen as a route to academic excellence. For researchers in vulnerable situations, they can be a matter of survival," says Baraa Khuder, senior lecturer at Chalmers University of Technology and lead author of the study.

The study—"Academic Networking in Transition: Mapping Trajectories of Mobility and Precarity"—was conducted by Baraa Khuder, Chalmers University of Technology, and Bojana Petrić, University of London, and was recently published in Written Communication.

Being able to contribute strengthens relationships

The study is part of a three-year project on Syrian researchers in exile and their pathways into new academic environments. It explores how researchers build networks to support their efforts to write for scholarly publication. The most important finding was that networks became stronger and more sustainable when researchers were able to contribute themselves.

"We found that relationships became more enduring when researchers moved from being help-seekers to becoming collaborators, mentors or experts. They contributed methodological expertise, data, feedback and professional contacts of their own," says Khuder.

Small steps opened new opportunities

Progress often developed gradually. A single conversation could lead to an introduction, which in turn provided access to data or feedback on a manuscript. This could then develop into a new collaboration. The networks led to publications, conference presentations, applications for research funding and access to data. One of the researchers also secured a postdoctoral position through their network.

"We saw how what initially appeared to be a small step could, over time, lead to much more significant academic outcomes," says Khuder.

Universities need to support continued collaboration

Universities and research funders need to do more than simply create opportunities for researchers to meet, argues Khuder. She recommends support that helps researchers identify their goals, the contacts they need and what they themselves can contribute. Meetings and activities should then provide scope for ongoing collaboration.

She applies the same approach in her teaching of doctoral students. Participants map their future goals and networks and reflect on the support they need as well as what they can offer others.

"Informal meetings certainly have value, but our findings suggest that more guidance and structure are needed. Particularly for researchers in vulnerable situations, support needs to create the conditions for reciprocal and long-term collaboration," says Khuder.