Archaeologists discovered a faience workshop at the Sanam temple complex in ancient Nubia. Built by King Taharqo in the seventh century B.C., the site showed how rulers used craft production to boost royal power. Dr. Rennan Lemos said, "Recent scholarship has increasingly challenged older views that portrayed Kush simply as a copy."
Archaeologists have discovered a faience workshop at a major temple complex in the ancient Nubian capital of Napata, showing how the rulers of ancient Kush used specialized craft production to reinforce royal power.
Ancient Egypt thrived in the northern Nile Valley, but its southern neighbor, Nubia, in modern Sudan, was arguably just as important, with Nubia's Kushite Empire even taking over and controlling Egypt during the eighth century B.C.
However, while Egypt has captured the imaginations of people for centuries, we know comparatively little about Nubia, and scholarship has often viewed the Kushite Empire as imitating Egypt in many of its political and economic undertakings.
"Recent scholarship has increasingly challenged older views that portrayed Kush simply as a copy of Egypt, but important questions remain about how the Kushite state controlled resources, labor, production and the distribution of prestige goods," states the study's lead author, Dr. Rennan Lemos from Durham University.
To tackle these questions, Dr. Kathryn Howley from New York University and Lemos, alongside a team of investigators, excavated at the major temple complex of Sanam, built by the Kushite king Taharqo in the seventh century B.C. Their results are published in the journal Antiquity.
The authors uncovered the remains of a faience workshop at the temple, complete with hundreds of faience beads and even a faience shabti, a type of funerary figurine included in royal burials in both Egypt and Nubia.
"Faience is a deliberately manufactured vitreous material made mainly from silica mixed with varying amounts of alkali and lime. Firing the paste at relatively low temperatures produces a glassy surface, binding the material together. Faience was valued for its bright, glossy appearance, most often in blue, green or white. In ancient Egypt, it was called 'that which is brilliant,' reflecting both its shine and role as a desirable material," write the authors.
Faience production was a noxious, smoky process, so it is perhaps surprising to find a faience workshop so close to a religious center. In Egypt, faience workshops were typically located on the edges of settlements.
However, temples were central to the Nubian state economy, intrinsically linked to royal power.
Therefore, the benefits of associating faience production with royal authority likely outweighed the unpleasant side effects of firing, indicating that royal power was closely linked with control of the production of valuable goods in ancient Nubia.
"This evidence demonstrates that Sanam Temple was not simply a religious monument but also a center of state-controlled production," Lemos says. "The workshop produced faience objects associated with royal power, including shabtis destined for the royal cemetery at Nuri."
Importantly, while Kush's uses for faience were likely inspired by Egyptian practices, the research indicates that production methods differed greatly.
"The workshop reveals Kushite craftspeople adapted Egyptian-inspired technologies to local conditions," explains Lemos. "Instead of relying on limestone, which is scarce in much of Sudan, they appear to have used crushed seashells as a source of lime in the faience recipe. This points to technological innovation rather than simple imitation."
The discovery provides rare, direct evidence for how Kush exercised power. It suggests that the state controlled not only the production of prestigious objects but also access to the raw materials, labor and specialized knowledge required to make them.
It also shows how Kush differed from Egypt. While power in Egypt was typically expressed through the control of land and agriculture, the research suggests that the Kushite state derived its authority from controlling the production of prestige objects.
"This highlights the creativity and agency of ancient Nubian societies," Lemos concludes. "Rather than merely adopting Egyptian cultural practices, the Kushites selectively adapted foreign technologies and ideas, developing their own production methods and creating objects that carried specifically Kushite social and political meanings."
