Supreme Court issues notices to MP Sanjay Raut, journalist Nikhil Wagle over remarks targeting CJI, judiciary

SCBA President and senior advocate Pradeep Rai alleged that the remarks by Mr. Raut and Mr. Wagle went beyond the bounds of fair criticism and were capable of undermining public confidence in the Supreme Court

Supreme Court issues notices to MP Sanjay Raut, journalist Nikhil Wagle over remarks targeting CJI, judiciary left Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut, along with the INDIA bloc leaders, addresses the media over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) row in New Delhi on October 13, 2026. AICC President Mallikarjun Kharge and AISA National President Neha Bora present. ANI ANI https://th-i.thgim.com/public/incoming/lt0lm/article71591681.ece/alternates/FREE_1200/20261013367L.jpg ANI New Delhi, Oct 13 (ANI): Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut, along with the INDIA bloc leaders, addresses the media over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) row, in New Delhi on Tuesday. AICC President Mallikarjun Kharge and AISA National President Neha Bora present. (ANI Photo/Ritik Sharma)

SCBA President and senior advocate Pradeep Rai alleged that the remarks by Mr. Raut and Mr. Wagle went beyond the bounds of fair criticism and were capable of undermining public confidence in the Supreme Court

New Delhi

The Supreme Court on Friday (October 16, 2026) issued show-cause notices to Shiv Sena (UBT) Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Raut and journalist Nikhil Wagle in criminal contempt proceedings over their public remarks concerning Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and the judiciary.

https://www.thehindu.com/topic/rajya-sabha-mp-sanjay-raut/

A Bench comprising the CJI and Justice Joymalya Bagchi, however, exempted Mr. Raut and Wagle from personal appearance on the next date of hearing, saying it would first consider their explanations.

The show-cause notices were issued on a contempt plea filed by the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA).

Sanjay Raut has to explain his conduct, says SC while hearing plea over SIR Sanjay Raut has to explain his conduct, says SC while hearing plea over SIR Sanjay Raut is one of the co-petitioners among the 13 petitioners in the plea filed by Rahul Gandhi Sanjay Raut has to explain his conduct, says SC while hearing plea over SIR storyline 1

SCBA President and senior advocate Pradeep Rai alleged that the remarks by Mr. Raut and Mr. Wagle went beyond the bounds of fair criticism and were capable of undermining public confidence in the Supreme Court.

Expressing concern over statements targeting the judiciary, the CJI observed that courts had consistently upheld personal liberty and fundamental rights, making attacks on the institution particularly unfortunate.

The SCBA pressed for the personal appearance of the respondents. The Bench, however, decided to issue show-cause notices first.

"We are giving a show-cause notice as of now. Of course, we are granting an exemption from personal appearance. Let us see," the Bench said.

Earlier, Attorney General R Venkataramani had granted consent for initiating criminal contempt proceedings under Section 15(1)(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

Democratic and political protests must take place, but SC must not be dragged into it: CJI Democratic and political protests must take place, but SC must not be dragged into it: CJI "There should not be any inconvenience caused to litigants, lawyers, court staff. I have also requested..." Chief Justice Kant said in open court Democratic and political protests must take place, but SC must not be dragged into it: CJI storyline 1

The SCBA filed its petition on October 15 and Venkataramani granted consent the same day.

The controversy followed the CJI's decision to decline a request for a personal meeting by a delegation of Opposition parties, indicating that the matter could instead be brought before the court through a petition.

According to the SCBA's petition, Wagle subsequently posted an alleged abusive remark directed at the CJI on his X account. He later reportedly withdrew his remarks.

Mr. Raut also made some alleged objectionable remarks.