The Punjab and Haryana high court on Monday handed over an investigation into alleged top-level government corruption in Punjab to the CBI. The court directed the agency to register a case and submit a report within two months. This followed a PIL filed on August 27 regarding widespread bribery allegations.
Chandigarh: The Punjab and Haryana high court on Monday handed over an investigation into Enforcement Directorate (ED) letters detailing alleged top-level government corruption in Punjab directly to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).
A division bench of chief justice Ashwani Kumar Mishra and justice Rohit Kapoor directed the CBI to register a criminal case and submit a status report within two months. The court further ordered the Punjab government and state police to render full cooperation and assistance to the central agency during the inquiry.
The order was passed on a public interest litigation (PIL) filed on August 27 by advocate Nikhil Saraf. Saraf sought an independent central probe after state authorities failed to act on three formal communications sent by the ED to Punjab director general of police (DGP) Gaurav Yadav between July 24 and August 12. The PIL alleged widespread corruption by senior state officials across multiple domains, including cash-for-transfers, policy manipulations, and tender allocations.
According to the ED's letters -- derived from material seized during an ongoing money-laundering investigation involving GMADA land allotments -- a private individual named Nitin Gohal acted as an intermediary for Rajbir Singh Ghuman, the officer on special duty (OSD) to chief minister Bhagwant Mann. The ED alleged that Gohal, in collusion with Ghuman and other associates, including Bir Devinder and Jitin Gohal, operated an organised bribery network out of the chief minister's office. The network allegedly collected crores in cash and real estate in exchange for influencing IAS/IPS postings, leaking confidential government files, facilitating arms licences, and clearing commercial projects. The state government had opposed the PIL, questioning its maintainability and the credentials of the petitioner. Appearing for the state, the advocate general argued that police were actively examining the matter and maintained that an FIR could not be registered without completing a preliminary inquiry, seeking a three-week extension on September 14 when judgment was reserved.
The ruling triggered immediate political fallout. Opposition leaders, including Punjab leader of opposition Partap Singh Bajwa, welcomed the court's intervention and demanded an impartial, time-bound probe to hold powerful officials accountable.
Meanwhile, the ruling Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) accused the Union government of misusing central agencies like the ED to defame the state administration.