SEBI chairman Tuhin Kanta Pandey said on Wednesday that limits on money sent abroad rest with the RBI. While SEBI allowed portfolio managers to invest client funds overseas on 24 September, Pandey noted that everything must be consistent with FEMA rules. He said regulators focus on making registration easier for investors.
Market Mastery
Webinar by Vishal Malkan
Find the weak links
in your portfolio by Vishal Malkan
SEBI chairman Tuhin Kanta Pandey on Wednesday clarified that limits on how much money can be sent abroad rest with the RBI, days after the market regulator allowed portfolio managers to invest client funds overseas.
Speaking at the Association of Portfolio Managers in India (APMI) annual conference, Pandey was asked whether the new permission could lead to more Indian money moving out of the country. He said how much can go out, and in what manner, is a matter for the RBI, and that everything must be consistent with the Liberalised Remittance Scheme (LRS) and FEMA rules.
SEBI's board approved the SEBI (Portfolio Managers) Regulations, 2026 on 24 September. They permit discretionary and non-discretionary portfolio managers to invest in specified overseas securities, including listed equity and debt, REITs, overseas mutual funds, ETFs, index funds and foreign government debt. The permission is subject to FEMA and the RBI's LRS.
The chairman did not go into how the limits would apply to PMS clients' overseas allocations. He pointed to the RBI on that.
Registration documents through SWIFT
Pandey also said the RBI is looking at allowing FPI registration documents to be uploaded through SWIFT.
He said SEBI and the RBI are working to make FPI registration faster, seamless and digital. He listed steps already taken: a revamped NSDL front end, the India Market Access portal, a common application portal that allows tracking, digital signatures in place of wet signatures, and e-power of attorney. These reduce the need for notarisation, apostille and consularisation, he said.
Asked about the Indian market's recent decline compared with Japan and Korea, Pandey said where to invest is for investors to decide and it would not be appropriate for regulators to comment. He said the regulators' focus is on making registration easier.
On delisting
Responding to a question on listed companies with no visible business activity, Pandey said exchanges have a continuing duty to monitor companies after listing. Where a company is not physically present or carrying out economic activity, delisting provisions exist, and delistings have taken place before. He said the process should be pursued properly, as investors need confidence that listed companies are genuine.
He said physical verification by exchanges is feasible. On promoter-level deals at unlisted holding companies, he said SEBI must act in line with the Companies Act and the listing regulations